Our Mission

The mission of ACT Jacksonville is to expose radical islam in our midst by informing and educating the citizens of Jacksonville of the insidious nature of stealth jihad and mobilizing to defeat the spread and implementation of islamic sharia law.
Showing posts with label apostate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label apostate. Show all posts

Thursday, June 9, 2011

Did Anthony Weiner Convert to Islam and who is Huma Abedin

Did Anthony Weiner Convert to Islam and who is Huma Abedin


Hightlights in Red are added by Randy McDaniels for additional insight into this article.

Did Anthony Weiner Convert to Islam?

By Ben Barrack WebToday (June 8, 2011)-- The New York Times reports that Rep. Anthony Weiner's wife – Huma Abedin – is a “practicing Muslim” who was raised in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. In 2007, the New York Observer wrote – article no longer available but cross-posted at Free Republic – that her mother is a professor in Saudi Arabia and that her father was an Islamic scholar before his death.

Who is Huma Abedin and what does she do????? Hint... she works for Hillary Clinton

Secretary Hillary Clinton 7th Floor - State Department

Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations Huma Abedin 202-647-9572

Islamic law forbids any Muslim woman from marrying a non-Muslim man. Weiner was raised Jewish but admitted to growing up in a non-religious household. Sacred Islamic Law Manual/Umdat Al Salik Book of Marriage M.4.2 (2) and M. 4.3 forbids a Muslim from marrying an apostate or corrupt man.

If Abedin remains a practicing Muslim and her religion forbids her from marrying a non-Muslim, which of the two of them is the mostly likely convert?

Known as the Shahada
, the Islamic testimony of faith is very short. Weiner would have been required to say it according to Islamic law.

Otherwise, Abedin would have violated a primary tenet of her religion. Here is what Weiner would have had to say in order to be able to marry Abedin according to Sharia law: “There is no God except Allah and Muhammad is his messenger.”

Curiously, the imam of the Islamic Cultural Center of New York (ICC), of which Ground Zero mosque Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is a trustee, is a man named Sheik Omar Abu-Namous. He is calling for Abedin to stand by Weiner.

Why would an imam encourage a Muslim woman to remain married to an unfaithful, Jewish man?

Feisal Rauf mentioned above also has a long history of Muslim Brotherhood ties to include;


§Rauf Friends of spiritual chief Yusuf al-Qaradawi via al-Taqwa Bank who champions shariah Law.
§Perdona Global Peace Org (MB, Hamas, AQ)
§ Jamal Barzinji MB Leader is a partner in Cordoba Initiative
§ Farouk Kahn – Daisy Uncle, Board member of ISNA, IMANA, and ICNA & Westbury Mosque Chair until 2006(MB)
§ Rauf's Manhattan ASMA offices at 475 Riverside Drive occupy the suite next door to (CAIR)
§ Alwaleed Bin Talal funds over 300K to Raufs Muslims Leaders of Tomorrow.
Hisham Elzanaty -- an Egyptian-born businessman from Long Island -- provided a big chunk of the $4.8 million needed to buy the building that will be demolished to make way for the mosque. Donates to HLF an organization which was shut down in the largest terrorism funding trial in U.S. history in 2008, which resulted in CAIR and other Muslim Brotherhood member being sentenced up to 65 years in prison.


Feisal Rauf Sr. who;
Ø Taught at Al Azhar Univ. CAIRO Egypt
Ø Al Azhar approves Umdat Al Salik/Reliance (Islamic Law re: Jihad, Apostasy, Homosexuality, gender Equality)
Ø Contemporary of Hassan Al Banna (Founder of Muslim Brotherhood) & attended
Al Azhar University together
ØExpanded Islam in UK, Indonesia, and U.S.
Funded his Mosques by state sponsors of terror and Muslim Brotherhood members/entities, which Feisal Rauf Jr. now runs.
He is calling for Abedin to stand by Weiner.

Why would an imam encourage a Muslim woman to remain married to an unfaithful, Jewish man?

Compounding this matter further is the fact that Abu-Namous was quoted in 2001 as saying: “A unified Muslim state would be the ideal instrument to convince the world that Islam is the last version of God's word. God meant his word to be obeyed.”

In 2007, Abu-Namous spoke alongside the director of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)
at the First National Summit of Imams and Rabbis. Abu-Namous is on record as having said there was no conclusive evidence that Muslims were responsible for the September 11th attacks. Ironically, Abu-Namous's predecessor (Feisal Rauf) at the ICC blamed the Jews for 9/11.

ISNA is a Muslim Brotherhood group.

There is a question that needs to be answered. Did a secular Jewish man convert to Islam or did his (still) practicing Muslim wife abandon her religion by marrying him?

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Do You HEAR....... what I HEAR? Introduction to Islamic Double Speak by Randy McDaniels

Do You HEAR…… what I HEAR?
An introduction to Islamic Double Speak by Randy McDaniels

Over the past few years I have devoted a great portion of my time to educating various TEA Party and other civic groups on “The Nature of the Threat” in regard to the Muslim Brotherhood and Islam.

Terms like terrorism and Jihad have become household names. Islamic groups like HAMAS, Al Qaeda, Taliban and more recently the Muslim Brotherhood are also becoming common topics of interest, especially in light of the collapse of Egypt and the wave of unrest unfolding in the Middle East today.

As a result of these events, Americans are becoming increasingly concerned and want to know more about Islam. Grassroots organizations like ACT! for America, Stop the Islamization of America and The UNITED WEST are answering the call. They are educating the public and confronting those within the Islamic Movement in America head on.

Due to successful outreach and the gravity of the situation, we are beginning to see more involvement from the TEA Party, 912, and other patriotic groups…..which leads me to the topic I want to discuss.

Do you HEAR what I HEAR?

When speaking on Islam, I often ask the audience if anyone has ever heard a Muslim
(or follower of Islam) say that Islam does not condone the killing of innocent civilians? Or that they condemn Terrorism? For that matter, have you heard similar statements?

What do you think when Imam Feisal Rauf (the proponent of the Ground Zero Mosque) says he condemns terrorism?

Do you think the Imam is sincere? If yes, isn’t Imam Rauf a “Moderate” or “good” Muslim?
How about when Feisal Rauf brings up the fact that American Muslims also died on 911, when the WTC towers fell? How does this make you feel? After all, weren’t Muslims victims of the same attack? Are not their dead being mourned by the Islamic community as well?

There is a duality in Islam that we in the West have a hard time wrapping our head around. This fact, accompanied with our society’s tolerant and accepting nature as a whole as well as our Constitutional freedoms, leaves us very vulnerable to goals of the Muslim Brotherhood in accordance with Islamic Doctrine.

When an Islamist speaks, there is often one statement, but there are two messages or meanings, one for the non-Muslim and another for the Muslim.

When an Islamist or even an Islamic Terrorist at times, say they do not condone the killing of innocent civilians, they 100% absolutely mean what they are saying.

However, they do not mean what WE think THEY mean.

For example, according to Islamic Doctrine;

Innocent Civilian: A non-Muslim is not considered innocent merely for the fact they are not a Muslim. Quite contrary to what we HEAR, it is actually an obligation for “good” Muslims to fight and kill disbelievers (refer to the Koran -- Sura 9:5 the final verse on the subject).

Take for instance: Terrorism is defined as the unjust killing of a Muslim ONLY!
So naturally, as a Muslim, wouldn’t I condemn the killing of my fellow Muslim brothers and sisters, or myself for that matter? Does this actually make a believer a “Moderate Muslim”?

Regarding Muslims who perished on that horrific day, forever known as 911, just how do faithful Muslims view their deaths in accordance with Islamic Doctrine?

First, you must understand ALL Muslims killed waging Jihad (Warfare against non-Muslims to establish the religion) go directly to paradise, to include those “good” Muslims who died in the towers.

But what about those Muslims who were NOT considered “good” Muslims or faithful?
Those Muslims were considered Apostates and therefore they were justified in killing them along with other disbelievers or Infidels.

In retrospect, wouldn’t a “Terrorist” or even a “good” Muslim consider this a win – win situation in accordance to Islamic Doctrine?

So I ask…..do Americans really misunderstand Islam?

Does the Media in most cases understand Islam or do they often go the route of political correctness to silence our opinions about these matters?

Americans are being attacked in many ways. The physical ones are easy to identify... (e.g. when an airplane crashes into buildings). The cunning ones are not so easy to detect, but are very real...which is why it is imperative that we educate ourselves to the threats we face.

If we don’t -- our enemies will continue to use stealth JIHAD to attack us in small increments via our social sector, community activism, and demands of cultural acceptance which are diametrically opposed to our Constitutional foundation.